A current review of the safety of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators.

EM Gavioli, N Guardado, F Haniff… - Journal of Clinical …, 2021 - search.ebscohost.com
EM Gavioli, N Guardado, F Haniff, N Deiab, E Vider
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 2021search.ebscohost.com
What is known and objective: Treatment with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance
regulator (CFTR) modulators has led to improved clinical outcomes and an increase in
lifespans of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. As CF patients continue to live longer, they are at
risk for developing adverse drug reactions associated with polypharmacy and CFTR
modulators. Comment: The authors aim to describe safety concerns of the current
combination CFTR modulators, based upon a literature review, including notable safety …
Abstract
What is known and objective: Treatment with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators has led to improved clinical outcomes and an increase in lifespans of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. As CF patients continue to live longer, they are at risk for developing adverse drug reactions associated with polypharmacy and CFTR modulators. Comment: The authors aim to describe safety concerns of the current combination CFTR modulators, based upon a literature review, including notable safety concerns and recommendations for drug‐drug interactions. What is new and conclusion: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator agents are generally well tolerated with low discontinuation rates when compared to placebo. Elevations in liver enzymes and drug‐drug interactions are the most notable safety concerns. Additionally, lumacaftor/ivacaftor has shown more respiratory‐related adverse events and drug‐drug interactions compared to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Postmarketing studies are needed to determine long‐term safety concerns.
search.ebscohost.com