A randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the effect of VISBIOME ES probiotic in people with HIV on antiretroviral therapy

RM Presti, E Yeh, B Williams, A Landay… - Open Forum …, 2021 - academic.oup.com
RM Presti, E Yeh, B Williams, A Landay, JM Jacobson, C Wilson, CJ Fichtenbaum, NS Utay…
Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2021academic.oup.com
Background A5350, a phase II, randomized, double-blind study, evaluated the safety and
tolerability of the probiotic Visbiome Extra Strength (ES) over 24 weeks and measured
effects on inflammation and intestinal barrier function. Methods The primary outcome was
change in soluble CD14 (sCD14) levels; secondary outcomes included safety and
tolerability, markers of inflammation and cellular activation, and microbiome. In a substudy,
gut permeability was assessed by paired colonic biopsies measuring the area of lamina …
Background
A5350, a phase II, randomized, double-blind study, evaluated the safety and tolerability of the probiotic Visbiome Extra Strength (ES) over 24 weeks and measured effects on inflammation and intestinal barrier function.
Methods
The primary outcome was change in soluble CD14 (sCD14) levels; secondary outcomes included safety and tolerability, markers of inflammation and cellular activation, and microbiome. In a substudy, gut permeability was assessed by paired colonic biopsies measuring the area of lamina propria occupied by CD4+ cells, interleukin (IL)-17+ cells, and myeloperoxidase (MPO). Changes between arms were compared with the 2-sample t test with equal variance or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For safety, the highest graded adverse events (AEs) were compared between arms using the Fisher exact test.
Results
Overall, 93 participants enrolled: 86% male, median age 51 years, median CD4 count 712 cells/mm3. Visbiome ES was safe and well tolerated. There was no difference in mean change in sCD14 from baseline to week 25/26 between placebo (mean change, 92.3 µg/L; 95% CI, –48.5 to 233 µg/L) and Visbiome ES (mean change, 41.0 µg/L; 95% CI, –94.1 to 176.2 µg/L; P=.60). Similarly, no statistically significant differences between arms in inflammatory marker changes were identified. In substudy participants, no statistical differences between arms for change in cellular marker expression or gut permeability were observed (P>.05 for all). The microbiome demonstrated increased probiotic species and a significant decrease in Gammaproteobacteria (P=.044) in the Visbiome ES arm.
Conclusions
Visbiome ES was safe and altered the microbiome but demonstrated no effect on systemic inflammatory markers, pathology, or gut permeability in antiretroviral therapy–treated people with HIV.
Oxford University Press